
NEWS Bills for House & Senate Hearings in AnnapolisIn order to file for a CPCN, Maryland statute requires the entity to be an “Electric Company.” We believe the legislators’ intent in crafting this article was to indicate that it was indeed important that an “Electric Company” should be in control of large transmission projects. The company should be the owner of the project, not simply a 5% stakeholder as in PATH. The possibility of the MPSC approving this obvious maneuver to circumvent the intent of the statute raises alarms with Sugarloaf Conservancy and other interested parties. For this reason Sugarloaf Conservancy has proposed modifying the current statute and received encouragement from our state delegates. This legislation, sponsored by Sue Hecht in the House and Alex Mooney & David Brinkley in the Senate, will clarify the definition of an “electric company to include that all owners of a project be electric companies and they exercise the authority to control the day-to-day business decisions of the enterprise, if passed. Letters to the delegates thanking them and asking for them to continue to support the bills will help to stop these types of potential corporate maneuvers! Maryland Virginia West Virginia We, therefore, are soliciting contributions! If You Are Contacted by Allegheny Energy… We would appreciate hearing about any contact folks have from Allegheny particularly since they are only seeking easements at this time. This means the property owner still has ownership, possibly liability, and tax responsibility! We can make a difference if we work together! See the map of final PATH at - pathtransmission.com - click on MAPS, then All Aerial Maps. Signs are available for sale: Intervener |
