Bullet Points for Letters to Our Elected Officials
Since this past October, Sugarloaf Conservancy has been calling on PATH Allegheny to conduct an independent study on the merits of using High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) underground for the PATH project. This is a mature technology, which allows for High Voltage transmission lines to be buried along existing right-of-ways such as railroad lines, roads or under existing transmission lines, thus minimizing environmental impacts.
Allegheny talks in general terms about why High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) will not work. Costs more, more environmental damage, longer outages when a line is broken and less reliable. They fail to offer any specific information to support their conclusions.
Clearing forests for a 200’ right-of-way (ROW) will increase the runoff into Bennett Creek and then into the Chesapeake Bay therefore decreasing the health of the bay. High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) can use an existing ROW of about 20 feet.
Clearing forests for a 200’ right-of-way (ROW) will increase the fragmentation of our forests and thus cause considerable damage Maryland’s wildlife. High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) can use an existing ROW of about 20 feet.
Sugarloaf Conservancy last October asked Allegheny Energy to commission an independent study on the merits of High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC).
Since providing our elected officials with the facts on High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) technology our County Commissioners and State Delegation have both unanimously supported our call for an independent study by sending letters to Allegheny energy. Our local newspaper, the Frederick News Post, has also written an editorial supporting our position.
I am asking for your support in joining the call now for PATH Allegheny to conduct an independent study before they file with the MPSC.
According to PJM electricity usage had decreased. With experts saying it will take years for the economy to recover, there is not the urgent need to proceed with building a new overhead HVAC transmission line. Why not take this opportunity to study and determine the best technology that will minimize the environmental impact.
We need your support now to keep Allegheny from causing more damage to the environment. No one wants a transmission line in his or her back yard; however, if one is necessary, then surely it should be constructed in a manner that minimizes the environmental impact.
(Governor) I request that you enter into a dialog with the Governors of Virginia and West Virginia about forming a “Regional Transmission Siting Agency. It is my understanding that if this was formed, the Federal Government could not usurp a decision made by the Maryland Public Service Commission.
(Governor, Mikulski, Cardin) I understand you have received a letter from Sugarloaf Conservancy asking for your support. I cannot comprehend why you would refuse to support such a reasonable position as to demand that Allegheny Energy conduct an independent study on the merits of High Voltage Direct Current underground technology before they submit their application to the Maryland Public Service Commission.
(Bartlett) I understand an aide has met with a member from Sugarloaf Conservancy asking for your support. I cannot comprehend why you would refuse to support such a reasonable position as to demand that Allegheny Energy conduct an independent study on the merits of High Voltage Direct Current underground technology before they submit their application to the Maryland Public Service Commission.
No decision is a decision. No comment is a comment in support of Allegheny. |